TRUTH SERUM - MY CHARACTER HAS TO ANSWER ANY AND ALL QUESTION REGARDLESS OF WHAT IT IS.

bigbigtruck:

ohghostwhat:

Please preface questions with “Truth”

Aw shit let’s do this

If there is one thing I have learned from watching all these mumblecore videos in my film class, it is that there is obviously not enough indie movies about white twenty something men doing drugs while desperately searching for their purpose in life on road trips away from their nagging girlfriend.

scottfoss:

AU where instead of ever trying to start some kind of protest movement, Suzan convinced Aiden to go back to the sanctuary with her.
For all the fun and excitement they enjoyed together travelling through cities and experiencing new things, their contrasting politics end up proving to be disastrous upon settling into a more permanent domestic setting.
 Aiden’s aggressive nature would cause him to constantly come into conflict with Suzan’s role as the head authority, and never ceasing to push his own ideas and orders around. They would fight over this and a thousand other things, regularly. His need for control can’t make peace with the frustration of seeing Suzan sitting on all this land and influence over her inhabitants and not being able to take advantage of it. 
Daniel would grow up to be a lot less soft, and significantly better at hunting. Aiden prevents Suzan from coddling him and spoiling him with gifts, which also means his obsession with fashion is diminished. He also picks up a lot of negative personality traits from Aiden’s influence that deeply concern Suzan, both for Daniel’s sake and for the Sanctuary’s future.
Thing’s be a bad time. But Daniel wouldn’t have those dreads anymore, so some might say it would be worth it.
I have so many AU ideas, can anyone even keep track

scottfoss:

AU where instead of ever trying to start some kind of protest movement, Suzan convinced Aiden to go back to the sanctuary with her.

For all the fun and excitement they enjoyed together travelling through cities and experiencing new things, their contrasting politics end up proving to be disastrous upon settling into a more permanent domestic setting.

 Aiden’s aggressive nature would cause him to constantly come into conflict with Suzan’s role as the head authority, and never ceasing to push his own ideas and orders around. They would fight over this and a thousand other things, regularly. His need for control can’t make peace with the frustration of seeing Suzan sitting on all this land and influence over her inhabitants and not being able to take advantage of it. 

Daniel would grow up to be a lot less soft, and significantly better at hunting. Aiden prevents Suzan from coddling him and spoiling him with gifts, which also means his obsession with fashion is diminished. He also picks up a lot of negative personality traits from Aiden’s influence that deeply concern Suzan, both for Daniel’s sake and for the Sanctuary’s future.

Thing’s be a bad time. But Daniel wouldn’t have those dreads anymore, so some might say it would be worth it.

I have so many AU ideas, can anyone even keep track

Thursday’s Long Siesta page is up!
AU where instead of ever trying to start some kind of protest movement, Suzan convinced Aiden to go back to the sanctuary with her.
For all the fun and excitement they enjoyed together travelling through cities and experiencing new things, their contrasting politics end up proving to be disastrous upon settling into a more permanent domestic setting.
 Aiden’s aggressive nature would cause him to constantly come into conflict with Suzan’s role as the head authority, and never ceasing to push his own ideas and orders around. They would fight over this and a thousand other things, regularly. His need for control can’t make peace with the frustration of seeing Suzan sitting on all this land and influence over her inhabitants and not being able to take advantage of it. 
Daniel would grow up to be a lot less soft, and significantly better at hunting. Aiden prevents Suzan from coddling him and spoiling him with gifts, which also means his obsession with fashion is diminished. He also picks up a lot of negative personality traits from Aiden’s influence that deeply concern Suzan, both for Daniel’s sake and for the Sanctuary’s future.
Thing’s be a bad time. But Daniel wouldn’t have those dreads anymore, so some might say it would be worth it.
I have so many AU ideas, can anyone even keep track

AU where instead of ever trying to start some kind of protest movement, Suzan convinced Aiden to go back to the sanctuary with her.

For all the fun and excitement they enjoyed together travelling through cities and experiencing new things, their contrasting politics end up proving to be disastrous upon settling into a more permanent domestic setting.

 Aiden’s aggressive nature would cause him to constantly come into conflict with Suzan’s role as the head authority, and never ceasing to push his own ideas and orders around. They would fight over this and a thousand other things, regularly. His need for control can’t make peace with the frustration of seeing Suzan sitting on all this land and influence over her inhabitants and not being able to take advantage of it. 

Daniel would grow up to be a lot less soft, and significantly better at hunting. Aiden prevents Suzan from coddling him and spoiling him with gifts, which also means his obsession with fashion is diminished. He also picks up a lot of negative personality traits from Aiden’s influence that deeply concern Suzan, both for Daniel’s sake and for the Sanctuary’s future.

Thing’s be a bad time. But Daniel wouldn’t have those dreads anymore, so some might say it would be worth it.

I have so many AU ideas, can anyone even keep track

Pretty sure it's trans exclusionary, not eradicating. TERFs come from the school of thought that gender itself should be abolished since it is used often to keep people in certain roles and to keep stereotypes alive. (I.e. That gender as a social construct causes trans people's dysphoria) Basic third wave feminism. I'm not a TERF but have friends who are, they really are not as selfish or as hateful as they are perceived to be.

rosalarian:

I’ve heard exclusionary, eradicating, and erasing, and you know what? Same difference.

By excluding trans women from feminism, one is effectively eradicating them. By saying “I don’t care about the violence you face as a trans woman” either through disbelief or ignoring their situation, one becomes part of the system that perpetuates that violence. By saying trans women are “really men,” that’s actively harmful. By saying trans women’s issues are irrelevant to feminism, that’s actively harmful. Whether by their own hand or someone else’s, trans people in general and trans women in particular face an amount of violence that we can’t exclude from the issues of the feminist movement, can’t erase from the feminist movement, without the result being effectively eradicating them.

It is hateful to tell trans women that they aren’t women. It’s just as bad as telling lesbians we just need a good dicking or telling women to get back in the kitchen. Bigotry is bigotry. I’m sure your friends have some other wonderful qualities, but that particular one is incredibly ugly and don’t make excuses for it.

After two days, this required research assignment for my psychology class is going well

After two days, this required research assignment for my psychology class is going well

blueberrycyanide:

scottfoss:

That is now the third spider I have found in my bathroom in the last two days.

Where is the brood mother, so that I might slay this blight once and for all.

image

That’s where they come from. That’s why they hate us… that’s why they need us. That’s why they take us…. that’s why they feed us. But the true abomination… is not that it occurred, but that it was allowed.